|
Post by Durf on Aug 11, 2016 15:44:55 GMT -5
I like how the news headline says "how will the wikileaks documents effect american diplomacy"...huehue Only in good ways? Like honestly, since when is lying and manipulation a good thing. How is it bad that wikileaks prevents a PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE from doing that? American diplomacy my ass. Trump did say America looks weak. It's not because of inaction or peaceful relations...it's because of this shit. The same reason "free nations" look down on north korea. Their leaders are just too full of shit. But the appearance of not being full of shit is more important than...yknow...at the very least being adequate, let alone qualified for the job.
|
|
|
Post by D33P on Aug 20, 2016 19:51:02 GMT -5
If you guys are tired of TYT's main channel and their biased reporting as of late, check out the TYT Politics channel. Even though its the same organization, they are much more legit and do a lot of good reporting that exposes the establishment. Instead of 15 Trump videos for every 1 Hillary video like on TYT, its more like 3 Hillary/Establishment videos for every Trump video, plus lots of third party candidate things. Check it out: www.youtube.com/channel/UCuMo0RRtnNDuMB8DV5stEag/featuredOne of their recent videos is an in-depth interview about the election fraud during the primaries, which TYT's main channel hardly touched at all:
|
|
|
Post by D33P on Aug 23, 2016 21:25:11 GMT -5
After contemplating it for a few months, and looking at all the details, I think that it is almost certain that threats were used to coerce Bernie into endorsing Hillary. Above all, the most striking thing that has happened since he endorsed her is a lack of campaigning for Tim Canova, who is the primary opponent to Debbie Wasserman Shultz. Endorsing Hillary over Trump is one thing, but there is no plausible reason aside from a threat as to why he wouldn't campaign for the progressive who is running against the former head of the DNC who rigged the primary against him. Tim Canova is literally the face of Berniecrats, and is probably the most important of them all considering that he is running against DWS. Him striking a deal without threats being involved doesn't seem very plausible because what could the establishment have offered in exchange for both endorsing Hillary and not campaigning for Berniecrats? Along with a lack of campaigning, the speeches Bernie gave regarding Hillary were noticably rigid and lacking in passion, which is far from Bernie's style. Bernie also looked like a shattered person at the DNC, and I don't think he would be like that if he thought he had done something beneficial for the future of the country. www.reddit.com/r/Kossacks_for_Sanders/comments/4z7mjf/tyt_politics_tim_canova_hopes_bernie_sanders_will/
|
|
|
Post by D33P on Aug 24, 2016 0:44:07 GMT -5
I've been looking more into the potential election fraud during the primary, and it appears to be fairly damning. The most well known and comprehensive election fraud lawsuit was put forth by Election Justice USA, and gave an upper estimate that Bernie lost 184 delegates due to election fraud alone, which if true, means that he actually won more votes than Hillary did during the primary. The report they gave is 96 pages long, and can be found here: drive.google.com/file/d/0B5O9I4XJdSISNzJyaWIxaWpZWnM/viewThe lawsuit covers a variety of issues in a variety of states. Redacted Tonight did a segment that goes over a few of the findings in the lawsuit: After seeing the report and the video, you would think that Hillary supporters would try to go through some parts of the lawsuit and disprove the specific points that were made, right? Well, you would think wrong. From the time of this post, I have seen 0 pro-Hillary websites discuss this or even mention this. The most I could find were a few reddit comments that were basically "lol conspiracy theorists" that didn't even attempt to dive into the data. Give the implications of something like this, and how little it is currently talked about, I recommend that you become familiar with this report and talk about it to as many people as possible. I'm even planning on printing out certain pages of this and taking them with me to college so I can hand them out to people as evidence. Given the nature of this report, the most likely rebuttal will have to do with the credibility of the authors, EJUSA. If someone does this, point out that authority only matters when you have to take someones word for it i.e. when they don't have any evidence that they can show you and give you a "trust me". In this case, EJUSA uses evidence that is documented outside of their system, so you don't have to take their word for anything. All EJUSA did was consolidate, organize, analyze, and present the evidence.
|
|
|
Post by D33P on Aug 26, 2016 18:30:08 GMT -5
PBS cuts out the most important parts of their interview with Jill Stein to prevent people from being educated on Hillary:
|
|
|
Post by D33P on Sept 11, 2016 17:32:18 GMT -5
So Hillary had another medical "episode" today. She was at the 9/11 ceremony and had to leave early because she "overheated" even though it was in the mid 70's at the ceremony. When she was about to enter the van to take her away, she wobbled and lost total control of her legs as her staff had to drag her into the van. She either lost consciousness or had a seizure. Given her history of medical issues, especially recently, there's a decent chance she will be physically unable to continue the campaign and will have to be replaced. The only logical replacement would be Bernie, as he is the only other candidate who received delegates in the primary, and is also doing excellent in polling. But ofc, that will almost certainly not happen. So if Hillary does need to be replaced, watch for how the DNC will choose someone other than Bernie. Use that as further evidence that the process is rigged, as they won't even give the nomination to Bernie after Hillary dropped out. Link to the video: vid.me/UjS5
|
|
|
Post by D33P on Sept 11, 2016 17:38:05 GMT -5
Hillary only dreams she could be like Bernie
|
|
|
Post by Nathrezim on Sept 12, 2016 11:00:51 GMT -5
That second gif xD looks funny
|
|
|
Post by D33P on Sept 12, 2016 19:44:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by D33P on Sept 16, 2016 12:01:35 GMT -5
A new poll has found that if Hillary has to drop out, Bernie Sanders is by far the most favored option to replace her, according to polled Democrats. thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/296283-rasmussen-dems-want-sanders-running-if-clinton-drops-outAdd that to the list of reasons Bernie should replace her if she drops out (even tho he probably wouldn't): - Only other candidate to receive delegates in the primary
- Largest support among polled Democratic members
- Still making campaign and media appearances
- Only legit candidate, has support of the young people, only uncorrupt candidate, he actually won but it was rigged against him... ect.
|
|
|
Post by D33P on Sept 25, 2016 18:49:44 GMT -5
On Friday, Jane Sanders retweeted a video where Bernie tells his supporters that if he loses the nomination, to not listen to him if he tells them who to vote for. Don't know if it means anything, but it's interesting.
|
|
|
Post by D33P on Sept 28, 2016 8:09:00 GMT -5
During the debate, it appears that Hillary had some sort of LED display on her podium while Trump did not. It may have been to feed her lines to say, or maybe just to improve her lighting for the camera, but it was definitely not fair to Trump since it appears he did not have that display. Pretty clear evidence is in the link below. I looked at it a number of times and it seems hard to imagine that its just a spotlight turning on or something since nothing else around it becomes any more illuminated. www.reddit.com/r/Kossacks_for_Sanders/comments/54vdkd/hillary_cheats_hillarys_custom_podium_at_hofstra/
|
|
|
Post by D33P on Sept 29, 2016 10:18:41 GMT -5
All of the online polls after the debate showed Trump winning, either by a little or a lot. CNN did an "official" poll and found that Hillary won the debate. Turns out that the only significant groups of people that they polled were white people over the age of 50. gg
|
|
|
Post by D33P on Oct 4, 2016 18:22:26 GMT -5
Guccifer 2.0 has apparently hacked the Clinton Foundation and released some of the files. There's a chance they aren't legit, but take a look for yourself: guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/10/04/clinton-foundation/UPDATE: The Clinton Foundation has declined to comment on the leaks, which might be a sign that they are legit.
|
|
|
Post by D33P on Oct 4, 2016 20:29:01 GMT -5
|
|